Social Scoob

When Ideas Collide: The Wagh Bakri Ad Controversy and the Larger Debate on Creative Ownership
Brand Stratergies

When Ideas Collide: The Wagh Bakri Ad Controversy and the Larger Debate on Creative Ownership

May 6, 2025

Introduction

In the fast-paced world of advertising, where ideas are the currency and originality is gold, creative ownership is becoming more crucial than ever. A recent controversy involving Wagh Bakri Tea and the co-founder of Curativity has put a spotlight on this issue—sparking conversations about intellectual property, ethics, and respect for creators. But what really happened, and what can the industry learn from this?

Let’s dive into the heart of this high-stakes marketing dispute and unpack the broader implications for brands, agencies, and creatives alike.


What Sparked the Controversy?

The storm began when a new Wagh Bakri Tea advertisement hit social media. It featured a touching narrative centered around emotional bonding over tea—something very much in line with the brand’s long-standing messaging.

But what seemed like just another heartfelt campaign soon drew allegations from Curativity’s co-founder, who claimed that the core concept was strikingly similar to a pitch their agency had earlier presented to Wagh Bakri. According to the co-founder, the idea was shared in good faith and was allegedly lifted without consent or credit.

The post made waves online, drawing support from fellow creatives and raising eyebrows among brand loyalists. Was this just a coincidence, or did something more intentional take place?


The Bigger Issue: Who Owns an Idea?

At the core of the debate is a fundamental question: Who owns an idea once it’s pitched?

In advertising, ideas are frequently shared in preliminary meetings and pitch decks. While agencies often showcase their best creative work to win clients, there is an unspoken rule of trust—an ethical code that these ideas won’t be used unless an agreement is reached.

Unfortunately, the industry lacks strong legal protection when it comes to pitched concepts—especially when formal contracts aren’t signed. That’s why incidents like these often fall into a gray zone, where moral rights clash with business practices.


Why This Story Matters

This controversy is more than a one-off dispute. It reflects a systemic issue in advertising and branding—one where small agencies or freelancers may feel powerless against established corporations.

Key Takeaways:

  • Transparency and documentation should be central to every client-agency interaction.
  • Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) must be used proactively to safeguard creative pitches.
  • Brands need to uphold ethical standards, especially in a digital world where public scrutiny is instant and unforgiving.

Industry Voices Weigh In

The marketing community has rallied around the Curativity co-founder, with many sharing similar experiences. Social media platforms like LinkedIn have seen a surge of posts discussing the fine line between inspiration and imitation.

Creatives are now advocating for a shift in industry practices—one that protects ideation and ensures fair recognition. After all, creativity fuels the advertising world. Without trust and ethical collaboration, the entire ecosystem suffers.


What Can Brands Learn?

Brands like Wagh Bakri can use this moment as an opportunity—not only to address the specific allegations but also to reinforce their commitment to ethical storytelling.

Here are some practical steps:

  • Acknowledge and resolve disputes swiftly to maintain credibility.
  • Give credit where it’s due—co-creation can be a powerful brand-building tool.
  • Support creative partnerships, rather than treating agencies as replaceable vendors.

The Future of Creative Collaborations

The Curativity–Wagh Bakri incident underscores the need for structured, fair, and respectful engagements between brands and creative professionals. As content marketing continues to dominate digital spaces, the value of authentic, original ideas will only grow.

To stay ahead, companies must protect and nurture the creative minds that fuel their growth—not exploit them.


Final Thoughts

Creative ownership is not just a legal formality—it’s a recognition of the human effort, emotion, and imagination that go into every campaign. As the advertising world becomes more transparent and audience-driven, respecting that ownership will become a brand’s greatest asset.

This controversy may soon fade, but its lessons should echo across boardrooms and brainstorming sessions alike.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *